Climate Sceptics – Climate Sceptics call for water diversions from Northern Australia.

Press Release

Climate Sceptics call for water diversions from Northern Australia.

Climate Sceptics candidates Steve Davies (Barker) and Leon and Nathan Ashby (Senate) will tour Murray river towns early next week explaining their policy on water.
The party believes there is plenty of water in Australia and it would not support a water buy back policy for the River Murray but rather diverting water from Northern Australian rivers as the solution for extra water to SA. It would be a vastly improved Bradfield scheme something proposed over 70 years ago by the designer of the Sydney Harbour Bridge, John Bradfield
Lead senate candidate Leon Ashby says “Rivers such as the Clarence, Tully, Herbert, Burdekin, and Flinders in northern Australia have vast amounts flow into the sea during floods.
These floods could be diverted to flow to many places inland including down as far as Murray Bridge via gravity fed pipelines and channels.”

The Climate Sceptics President Leon Ashby has lived for a decade in northern Australia running several properties and says 6 times the total of the Murray Darling water runs out to sea into the gulf of Carpentaria each year. “There is no need to relocate communities along the Murray river to northern Australia, just use the funds promised for the ETS and water buybacks into building a visionary inland water system that provides a win win for farmers, cities and the environment. It would help populate inland Australia rather than the decimation that green ideas of the major parties espouse.” the former landcare secretary said.

He adds “Unfortunately Green Ideology prevents politicians of all parties from thinking logical. The ideology says no dams, no diversions, no development and no common sense.
Its just common sense that Northern river diversions are the obvious answer to Murray Darling basin and inland Australias water concerns.”

Barker Candidate Steve Davies says “Green ideology will not acknowledge the River Murray went dry 4 times in the early 1900s before weir and locks were built. Historically its obvious the river system has gone dry hundred times in the past.”
He concludes “Since the environment survived those times of no flows, we see no problem in looking after farmers irrigation needs ahead of environmental flows today.”

Leon Ashby says “Other political parties are putting the environment ahead of people. We see it differently. Climate change is cyclical, prosperity is necessary and environmental flows should cease when droughts occur so our rural communities can survive the tough times then when the waters return as they are doing now the environment recovers again”.
“We see no need to take water from farmers. Many have made improvements in efficiency but they get no reward for it”.
Leon Ashby concludes “Should we get someone elected, we will work our backsides off fighting for practical solutions and primary producers rights”.

10 comments to Climate Sceptics – Climate Sceptics call for water diversions from Northern Australia.

  • Praxiteles

    And the ecological systems that depend upon the annual flooding can just get stuffed, right?

  • Chris

    NT residents aren’t voting for him. So he probably doesn’t care.

  • David

    The real tragedy is that he’s drawn box A in this and the recent state election, so he’ll never really get a clear indication of community support, gven the donkey vote is notoriously difficult to track and account for.

    Also – “NT residentsMost people aren’t voting for him. So he probably doesn’t care.”

    FTFY

  • Chris

    Point taken.

    *Residents of northern Australia are not *able* to vote for him, so he does not have to worry about alienating them.

  • Both Kinds of Politics operating here I see, the Dave and Chris show, open your minds guys, while you are young

  • David

    I’m curious Mark. Do you think that we’re not giving everyone a chance to fully represent themselves? Do you even get why the site is called bothkindsofpolitics in the first place? Do you think that we’re only ever presenting the Labor and Liberal side of the story?

    BlueRedPill_0.jpg

    Exactly which of these do you think we’ve taken?

  • I will enjoy debating you in a few years time, is my answer

  • David

    Dude, you don’t enjoy debating me now. Why on earth would you think that you’re going to enjoy it in a few years time?

    Do you have plans to take up masochism as a lifestyle choice?

  • Chris

    Dave’s response is reflective of the fact that the climate sceptics polled abysmally, even with the donkey vote, at their most recent election. Which has nothing to do with openness of mind and everything to do with reality.

    My response is regarding Praxiteles’, in that – being on the SA senate ticket, not the NT ticket – Leon does not have to worry about alienating voters there with his policy, which this is likely to do. Also, nothing to do with openness of mind, and everything to do with practicality.

    There are certainly examples of our personal biases in some of our comments on this site, but this isn’t one of them.

    Except for the part where I call you an idiot for not realising that.

  • [...] Climate Sceptics – Climate Sceptics call for water diversions from Northern Australia. «… [...]

You must be logged in to post a comment.