Press Release
Climate Sceptic candidates to announce their vision for Northern Water diversions to SA Murray River irrigators
Aug 13th
On Monday Aug 14th at 10 am The Climate Sceptics will announce their Northern Australia Water diversion vision at Berri next to the River Murray.
Several Irrigator groups have been invited to attend the announcement and discuss the idea which Barker Candidate Steve Davies and Senate candidate Leon Ashby will explain.
Leon Ashby says “Australia has one of the world flattest inland landscapes that would lend itself to having the most efficient water diversion scheme in the world – if anti progress Green ideology was overcome.”
The environment award winner says “I lived in North Central Qld for a decade and saw the massive amounts of water that northern rivers have at times. I was runner up for a Qld Landcare research award which moved water gravitationally over a 10,000 acres rather than let it flow down several creeks) It was a mini version of what can be done across Australia.”
The Senate candidate says “There are 4 areas in Australia where water diversions should be properly investigated (provided most of the water was used for irrigation and city purposes) which then pays for the scheme.
1) The Clarence river in Northern NSW north of Coffs harbour (which has flooded 3 times in the last 18 months),
2) The Johnson, Tully, Herbert and Burdekin rivers dammed up at Hells gate and then run through a tunnel to the western side of the great dividing range. (The cost of the dam was $750 million last time it was researched).
3) A diversion from the Flinders, Normanton and Gilbert rivers down the west side of the Great dividing range and
4) A pipeline from Lake Argyle in the northern territory across to Qld.
Mr Ashby adds “In 1980s the Bjelke-Petersen government commissioned its own study. Bringing together four of Australia’s best-known hydraulic engineering firms – Gutteridge Haskins & Davey, Monro & Johnson, McIntyre & Associates, and Cameron McNamara – the State government formed the Bradfield (Northern Rivers) Study consortium in 1984.
This report was never released!”
Mr Ashby pledged that If elected to the SA Senate he will champion a visionary Northern river diversions system transparently pricing and evaluating each on their cost/ benefit ratio of volume water provided versus setup cost, and built in stages and structured so water and land sold as part of the scheme then paid for the building costs over time.
He concludes “Water could flow via gravity from Hells Gate in North Qld to Murray Bridge or almost anywhere in the Riverina if we desired it.
23% of Australias runoff (in other words 6 times the water in the Murray Darling) flow runs out into the Gulf of Carpentaria each year.
Only 3% of the water in Lake Argyle is used each year. There is oodles of water if we are not brainwashed into the anti progress green ideas.”
It is a plan that would stop Riverina farmers losing their water rights and bring greater prosperity to rural communities inland.
Climate ‘sceptics’: Ignoring reality since 1994
Listen, bozos: A sceptic is someone who does not accept a position until all the evidence is in. After that point it becomes perverse to keep questioning.
The evidence is in on climate science, but you pinheads are incapable of recognising it.
Dear SA voters,
I have a solution to all your water woes. It involves getting a whole lot of water from people a long way away, and in exchange we’ll give them our water problems.
Not too long ago, objects and ideas were all you could export. Then wonderful Mr Howard came up with the wonderful idea of exporting queue jumpers to Nar.. Nuar… somewhere in the Pacific. It was a bit rude of him to sneak most of them in anyway, under some “refugee” thing to do with “human rights”. Whatever that means.
I was dreaming about the good old days recently, and it struck me: you can export problems now! “What problems do people have here?” I asked myself. “What will people heap adulation upon me for fixporting?” (That’s a new word I invented, because I’m ingenus… inge… smart like that). And I noticed that a lot of people like water. And that they want more of it. So I thought to myself, “Let’s export the water problem to somewhere else people here don’t care about!”
I’m sure everyone will love my idea, so I expect a lot of people will be asking me about it. I might be a bit busy deciding on how to decorate my new office in Canberra though, so I might not be able to talk to all of you in person.
Yours sceptically,
Leon
Just following on from Praxiteles… does that make them “Climate Perverts”?
David,
I was trying to think of something witty to say in response. The best I can come up with is, “yes.”